After six years of having the issue delayed, pushed back, rejected and exalted, Californians will finally get their chance to vote on the development of a bullet train running from Los Angeles to San Francisco.

In the past, the initiative was criticized for political corruption. Ignoring common sense routes in favor of those which cut through protected wildlife preserves and ignored some of the highest segments of traffic in the state, Governor Schwarzenegger asked for the issue to be removed from the ballot in previous elections.

The 3rd time might wind up being the charm for the environmental/economic initiative exciting transit geeks all over the country. With fast trains growing in popularity in Europe and Asia, many Americans are waiting for the day we’ll see the technology lightning along our own shores. If California voters give a bullet train the green light, it’s sure to be a trend that crosses into other states as well.

As with any big government project, people on both sides of the issue are fighting for their wants to be met and at times allowing those issues to derail the whole process. Originally, alternative routes were hailed as better options than San Fran to LA. The choice of routes confused and angered many people who’d been watching the project unfold as the California High-Speed Rail Authority ignored expert recommendations and seemed to merely follow the money trail.

Now the Governor is saying enough changes have been made to give the project the go ahead, but - like so many voting decisions - inclusion on the ballot may reflect a vote for the lesser of two evils. Invest billions in a bullet train which won’t cater to the area’s major issues or forgo the technology all together and continue investing in less environmentally friendly option.

The Expense

The bond asks for $10 Billion to develop a high-speed train to service, initially, a 400 mile stretch. Critics claim the costs will expand to 5 times that cost, but it is expected that private investors will pick up part of that expense.

Experts say it is likely the cost will grow beyond $10 Billion but the costs will be offset by other expenses that won’t have to occur. Building onto the existing roadways and onto airport spaces will also come with a high price tag, and all the better if the money invested in the bullet train can cut down on the congestion or pollution of other methods of transportation.

The Time Frame

Much like the Phoenix Light Rail , this is a long-term project in the making. Service wouldn’t be expected to begin until at least 2020.

Americans in general aren’t good at waiting for projects to take form. They want a return on their investments now, today, and waiting over a decade to see the results may turn otherwise yes votes to no’s.

Cast Your Vote

Tuesday, November 4th, California voters will be asked whether it’s time to give this project the funding it needs. Whether it’s yes or no, this could be a milestone vote for American transportation.

Sources: Christian Science Monitor
California Rail News
The Sacramento Bee

[Image: Creative Commons]

If you live in the Adirondacks, have five kids, or actually want to spend over $50 at the pump, a scooter probably isn’t your bag. On the other hand, if you’re going solo, live in a reasonable climate, and scrimp to save, a motorized bike might be just the thing you need.

Julia Turner wrote a great review over at Slate.com, Cool Rider in which she reviews seven rides. Check it out, because as she points out, most retailers won’t let you take one for a test drive. (Unless, of course, you’re in Toys R Us. There’s nothing like buzzing past a baby stroller while horrified parents wonder why the staff isn’t doing anything but laughing.)

She gets much more in-depth than we do, and goes over which models are a bust. We give you pictures, and only the best of her best. ;)

Kymco People 50

Definitely one for the fellas, it comes in both blue and red. It seats one, and is moderately priced at just under $2500.00.

Malaguti Ciak 50

Oooh. This bike is plain hot, much more than the chunky 80’s-esque Kymco People, but from what Turner wrote, otherwise they’re surprisingly familiar. The Malaguti is a $100 or so more expensive, but it seats two riders. A definite plus in our book!

Yamaha Zuma

This bike’s sharp angles are laden with testosterone, but it’s also the fastest, cheapest bike of high quality that Turner test drove. 40 mph on flat roads? 30 on hills? Pretty good for a ride that’s under $2000.

The Cost of Insurance

Though they’re considered mopeds or motorized bikes in some areas (and motorcycles in others) scooters driven on the streets probably need two things in your area: a license or registration (or both) and insurance.

You might be tempted to buy liability only insurance for a bike that costs so little but be aware that mopeds are often stolen. Turner touches on this a bit, but it’s true. They’re small, easily portable, and most people don’t use a bike chain with them (because it looks dumb ... for the same reason, people suffer serious head and face injuries because they didn’t wear a helmet).

Full insurance may be worth your investment, and a myriad of available discounts - from parking in a garage, to being on the honor roll - can offer you a break.

[Images: Kymco, Malaguti, Yamaha]

You’d have to be living in a cave not to know that petroleum is a…Continue reading "The Five Best Alternative Transportation Options"

Debate rages about global warming. Is it a real threat and if so, what harm…Continue reading "Is Public Transportation Right For You?"